Publications

2026

Bellows, Brandon K, Yiyi Zhang, Natalia Ruiz-Negrón, Dhruv S Kazi, Amit Khera V, Jessica G Woo, Elaine M Urbina, et al. (2026) 2026. “Familial Hypercholesterolemia Screening in Childhood and Early Adulthood: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.”. JAMA 335 (2): 140-53. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.20648.

IMPORTANCE: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a genetic condition, results in lifelong increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increases lifetime cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Most individuals with FH remain undiagnosed, so early FH identification and treatment could lower CVD burden.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the projected cost-effectiveness of population sequential FH screening (lipid testing followed by genetic testing after a high LDL-C measurement) at 10 or 18 years of age.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The CVD Policy Model, a validated discrete event simulation of CVD risk factor management and CVD outcomes in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants, was used to simulate lifetime health and economic outcomes from a health care sector perspective for a hypothetical cohort of 4.2 million US 10-year-olds. Individual characteristics and health care processes informed CVD events (coronary heart disease or stroke) and survival probabilities. Model inputs included national data sources, clinical trials, pooled longitudinal cohort studies, and published literature.

INTERVENTIONS: Usual care assumed only opportunistic lipid testing and LDL-C and CVD risk-guided treatment. When added to usual care, sequential FH screening strategies examined combinations of childhood (age 10 years) or early adulthood (age 18 years) screening with 3 LDL-C thresholds (≥130 mg/dL, ≥160 mg/dL, or ≥190 mg/dL) to select patients for genetic testing.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were direct health care costs (2021 US dollars), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Future costs and QALYs were discounted 3% annually. Strategies with an ICER of less than $100 000 per QALY gained were considered cost-effective.

RESULTS: For the simulated cohort, usual care would lead to 3 118 000 (95% uncertainty interval, 3 061 000-3 192 000) total lifetime CVD events, with 16 182 (95% uncertainty interval, 15 683-16 827) among those with FH. Childhood FH screening could avert between 1385 and 1820 CVD events (<0.1% reduction in overall population), and early adulthood FH screening could avert between 1154 and 1448 CVD events (<0.1% reduction). While effective, no FH screening strategies were cost-effective relative to usual care; screening at age 18 years using an LDL-C threshold of 190 mg/dL or greater had the lowest ICER, at $289 700 per QALY gained. Sequential FH screening could become cost-effective vs usual care if lifetime lipid monitoring plus lifestyle therapy increased after a high screening LDL-C result, including for patients with non-FH dyslipidemias.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sequential FH screening in childhood or early adulthood could be effective but not cost-effective vs usual care. However, sequential FH screening could become cost-effective under highly optimistic assumptions about increased lifestyle therapy and increased lifetime lipid monitoring for patients with non-FH dyslipidemias.

Decker, Sérgio R R, Richard S Chaudhary, Kosuke Inoue, Yang Song, Chiadi E Ndumele, Sadiya S Khan, and Dhruv S Kazi. (2026) 2026. “Socioeconomic Factors and Initiation of Semaglutide or Tirzepatide Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes.”. Diabetes Care 49 (2): 277-81. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-1619.

OBJECTIVE: Identifying social and economic factors associated with initiation of semaglutide or tirzepatide may inform strategies to support equitable uptake.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using 100% of Medicare claims of patients ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The outcome was initiation of semaglutide or tirzepatide. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each exposure (self-reported race and ethnicity, dual enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid, rurality, and social vulnerability index), accounting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS: Among 13,922,387 patients with T2DM, 673,776 (4.8%) initiated semaglutide or tirzepatide in 2023. Minoritized racial and ethnic identity (e.g., non-Hispanic Black compared with White; aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.71-0.72), dual enrollment (aOR 0.90; 0.89-0.91), and residence in the most versus least vulnerable socially vulnerable neighborhoods (aOR 0.93; 0.92-0.93) were associated with lower initiation.

CONCLUSIONS: Minoritized racial and ethnic identity and adverse socioeconomic factors were associated with lower odds of initiation among Medicare beneficiaries with T2DM.

Mukhopadhyay, Amrita, Samrachana Adhikari, Xiyue Li, Dhruv S Kazi, Adam N Berman, Ian Kronish, Carine Hamo, et al. (2026) 2026. “Prior Authorization Requirements and Prescription Fill Patterns Among Patients With Heart Failure.”. JACC. Advances 5 (2): 102583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102583.

BACKGROUND: Prior authorizations could hinder the filling of life-saving heart failure (HF) medications, such as angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine whether prior authorizations were associated with delayed or decreased filling for ARNI and SGLT2i.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record, pharmacy fill, and neighborhood-level data from a large, academic health system. We included patients with HF and a new prescription for ARNI or SGLT2i between April 1, 2021, and April 30, 2023, and assessed for presence of prior authorization requirement. Outcomes included days to first fill and never filling the prescription. Analyses were conducted using inverse probability weighting methods.

RESULTS: Among 2,183 patients, 12.2% (152/1,243) and 14.3% (165/1,150) had a prior authorization requirement for ARNI or SGLT2i, respectively. Patients requiring prior authorization tended to be younger, identify as non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, have non-Medicare insurance, and have fewer comorbidities. In weighted models, patients requiring prior authorization took 3.03 (95% CI: 2.16-4.25) times longer to fill ARNI, 6.75 (95% CI: 4.44-10.3) times longer to fill SGLT2i, and were 2.23 (95% CI: 1.37-3.65) times more likely to never fill SGLT2i prescriptions (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Prior authorization requirements were more common for patients identifying as Black or Hispanic and were associated with decreased and delayed filling of ARNI and SGLT2i. Our findings highlight an important barrier to mortality-reducing, guideline-recommended medications for HF.

Varghese, Merilyn S, Ling Han, Parul U Gandhi, Melissa Skanderson, Wen-Chih Wu, Kariann R Drwal, Matthew M Burg, et al. (2026) 2026. “Cardiac Rehabilitation Utilization Among Veterans: A Sex-Based Analysis.”. JACC. Advances 5 (3): 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102615.

BACKGROUND: Veterans are at an increased cardiovascular risk compared to age- and sex-matched non-Veterans. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve outcomes in cardiovascular disease, but its use in men and women Veterans is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine CR participation by sex and socioeconomic status among Veterans.

METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, using a national electronic health record database. The primary outcome was participation in at least 1 CR session among patients within 1 year of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models accounted for patient-level (demographics, medical/psychiatric comorbidities) and community-level factors. Area deprivation indices (ADIs) (analyzed as quartiles) assessed socioeconomic status.

RESULTS: Among 82,496 CR-eligible Veterans (3.6% women), CR participation was low (10.4%) and similar by sex (women = 10.2%, men = 10.4%). Women Veterans did not differ significantly in CR participation compared to men Veterans after adjusting for patient-level and community-level characteristics, including age, race, cardiac and comorbidities, mental health risk factors, rural-urban status, and ADI (adjusted OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.79-1.03; P = 0.121). Veterans in the most deprived ADI quartile were less likely to participate vs the least deprived quartile (adjusted OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.75-0.89; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: CR participation among U.S. Veterans remains low, far below that of the Medicare population (10.4% vs 28%), with no significant differences in initiation by sex. However, low socioeconomic status is associated with decreased uptake. Further research is needed to explore innovative, Veteran-specific CR delivery models.

Kazi, Dhruv S, Abdul R Abdullah, Suzanne Arnold V, Anirban Basu, Brandon K Bellows, Khadijah Breathett, Derek S Chew, et al. (2026) 2026. “2025 AHA/ACC Statement on Cost/Value Methodology in Clinical Practice Guidelines (Update From 2014 Statement): A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.”. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 87 (9): 1177-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.009.

AIM: The "2025 AHA/ACC Statement on Cost/Value Methodology in Clinical Practice Guidelines (Update From 2014 Statement)" describes a systematic approach for consistent implementation of "economic value statements" across ACC/AHA guidelines. It updates the cost-effectiveness threshold and proposes a new level of certainty framework that summarizes the strength of the available evidence. Additionally, it describes how cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) can help advance equity in population cardiovascular health.

METHODS: A focused literature search was conducted from January 9, 2024, to February 2, 2024, encompassing English-language publications related to CEA methodology in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, with publication dates ranging from 1973 to the present. Additional relevant studies published during the writing process (through June 25, 2024) were also considered by the writing committee.

STRUCTURE: This Cost/Value Methodology Statement updates prior guidance regarding the incorporation of evidence from published CEAs into clinical guidelines. It provides guidance for identifying and synthesizing relevant high-quality evidence, developing economic value statements, and communicating level of certainty in such statements. It defines the US cost-effectiveness threshold as $120,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, highlights special considerations related to cardiovascular drugs and devices, emphasizes health equity considerations when interpreting CEAs, and defines a reference case for future CEAs.

Palaniappan, Latha P, Norrina B Allen, Zaid I Almarzooq, Cheryl A M Anderson, Pankaj Arora, Christy L Avery, Carissa M Baker-Smith, et al. (2026) 2026. “2026 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.”. Circulation 153 (9): e275-e906. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001412.

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The 2026 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS: The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistics Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2026 Statistics Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2025 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes a new chapter on cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome, as well as an expanded chapter on tobacco and nicotine use and exposure.

RESULTS: Each of the chapters in the Statistics Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS: The Statistics Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Kiyohara, Yuko, Tadao Aikawa, Tetsuya Saito, Abel Casso Dominguez, Jose Wiley, Dhaval Kolte, Eric A Secemsky, et al. (2026) 2026. “Comparison of Limus and Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons, Second-Generation or Newer Drug-Eluting Stents, and Balloon Angioplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.”. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 19 (1): e016005. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016005.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents are comparable in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and whether limus versus paclitaxel DCBs yield similar clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of limus and paclitaxel DCBs in patients with CAD through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS: We comprehensively searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials comparing the following 4 strategies: limus DCB, paclitaxel DCB, second-generation or newer drug-eluting stent, and plain old balloon angioplasty. The primary outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), typically a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. Secondary outcomes included individual components of MACE. We performed subgroup analyses for in-stent restenosis, small-vessel (<3 mm) CAD, and other de novo CAD, such as large vessel and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

RESULTS: We identified 39 randomized controlled trials including 10 219 patients. There was no significant difference in MACE between limus and paclitaxel DCBs (relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.86-1.73]). There were no significant differences in MACE between limus or paclitaxel DCB and second-generation or newer drug-eluting stents. Plain old balloon angioplasty had an increased risk of MACE compared with others. These results were consistent across subgroup analyses for in-stent restenosis, small-vessel CAD, and other de novo CAD.

CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in MACE or its components between limus and paclitaxel DCBs, albeit with limited statistical power. Furthermore, DCB and second-generation or newer drug-eluting stents yielded similar outcomes though power was limited, especially for other de novo CAD.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD420250654276.

Medina, Frank A, Ramya C Mosarla, Joseph M Kim, Siling Li, Yang Song, Robert W Yeh, and Eric A Secemsky. (2026) 2026. “Adjunctive Imaging and Physiology During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends, Outcomes, and Costs Among Medicare Beneficiaries.”. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 19 (1): 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2025.09.047.

BACKGROUND: The dual use of intravascular imaging (IVI) and invasive physiology (IP) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well described in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure trends, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with the use of IVI and IP, alone and together, during PCI.

METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service claims were used to analyze trends in the use of IVI and/or IP during PCI from 2016 to 2023. Beneficiaries ≥65 years of age with a first PCI during the study period were included in the outcomes analysis. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and all-cause death at 2 years. Multivariable Cox proportional regression was used to assess outcomes. Gamma regression was used to assess costs.

RESULTS: A total of 2,538,154 PCIs were performed in 1,958,990 patients from 2016 to 2023. After exclusion, a total of 1,587,532 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, IVI was used in about 15%, IP in 7%, and dual IVI and IP in 2.5% of all PCIs. By 2023, the use of IVI and dual IVI and IP increased to about 30% and 4.7%, respectively. Dual IVI and IP was associated with lower rates of MACE at 2 years compared with angiography alone (adjusted HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.89; P < 0.0001). The cost analysis showed higher upfront procedural costs but lower long-term costs associated with any use of IVI and/or IP.

CONCLUSIONS: The dual use of IVI and IP has marginally increased and was associated with lower MACE and long-term costs compared with angiography alone.