Publications

The objective of this study was to measure the contemporary patency rates and frequency of interventions required for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) care in a representative US population of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including by age, race, and gender. All Medicare beneficiaries aged >20 years who underwent AVF graft creation for end-stage kidney disease between 2017 and 2019 were included for analysis. The primary end points included primary patency, primary assisted patency, postintervention patency, and fistula functionality up to 1 year after AVF placement. The secondary end point included admission for an associated adverse event after AVF creation. Multivariate analysis of patency rates was also assessed. Of 43,457 patients included in the analysis, the cumulative primary patency at 90 days was 68.4% and at 1 year, 31.5%. At 1 year, the primary assisted patency rate, postintervention patency, and fistula use were 70.4%, 30.2%, and 59.1%, respectively. There was no difference in primary patency rates when comparing age groups (age 40 to 59 years: hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.06, p = 0.84 or age ≥60 years: HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04, p = 0.61) with the reference of age group 20 to 39 years. Women were at greater risk of experiencing primary patency failure than were men (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.20, p <0.001), and Black patients were at greater risk of experiencing primary patency failure than were White patients (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.38, p <0.001). The cumulative incidence of admissions for adverse events was 32.6% at 1 year. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the real-world AVF patency rates remain low, with disproportionately low rates in women and Black patients.

BACKGROUND: Many research investigations for pulmonary embolism (PE) rely on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for analyses of electronic databases. The validity of ICD-10 codes in identifying PE remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to validate an algorithm to efficiently identify pulmonary embolism using ICD-10 codes.

METHODS: Using a prespecified protocol, patients in the Mass General-Brigham hospitals (2016-2021) with ICD-10 principal discharge codes for PE, those with secondary codes for PE, and those without PE codes were identified (n = 578 from each group). Weighting was applied to represent each group proportionate to their true prevalence. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE was compared with adjudication by independent physicians. The F1 score, which incorporates sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), was assessed. Subset validation was performed at Yale-New Haven Health System.

RESULTS: A total of 1712 patients were included (age: 60.6 years; 52.3% female). ICD-10 PE codes in the principal discharge position had sensitivity and PPV of 58.3% and 92.1%, respectively. Adding secondary discharge codes to the principal discharge codes improved the sensitivity to 83.2%, but the PPV was reduced to 79.1%. Using a combination of ICD-10 PE principal discharge codes or secondary codes plus imaging codes for PE led to sensitivity and PPV of 81.6% and 84.7%, respectively, and the highest F1 score (83.1%; P < .001 compared with other methods). Validation yielded largely similar results.

CONCLUSION: Although the principal discharge codes for PE show excellent PPV, they miss 40% of acute PEs. A combination of principal discharge codes and secondary codes plus PE imaging codes led to improved sensitivity without severe reduction in PPV.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in aortic endovascular interventions, including thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), may have similar benefits to those seen in coronary and peripheral interventions, but limited utilization and outcome data exist.

METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data were used to identify patients undergoing TEVAR and EVAR from 2016 to 2023. Utilization trends were stratified by region, urbanicity, distressed communities index, community versus academic center, Medicare versus dual enrollment status, indication, urgency, and presence of dissection with malperfusion. Inverse probability weighting was used to assess the impact of IVUS on a composite outcome of repeat aortic intervention or death. Cox regression was used to estimate weighted hazard ratios.

RESULTS: A total of 136 540 patients underwent TEVAR and EVAR, of which 9.8% (13 364) used IVUS. IVUS use increased slightly from 2016 to 2023, driven more by use in TEVAR compared with EVAR, and was higher in academic settings, with Medicare and Medicaid dual enrollment, in the West, with dissections, with malperfusion and for elective procedures. IVUS was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome at 30-days (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73-0.89]; P<0.001) and 6-months (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-0.99]; P=0.022) for all-comers. Subgroup analysis suggested lower risks of the primary outcome with IVUS use for aneurysm driven by the abdominal segment, malperfusion, thoracoabdominal dissection with malperfusion, thoracoabdominal repair, and chronic kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS: IVUS use has increased slightly in TEVAR and EVAR with heterogeneity in use. IVUS implementation during TEVAR and EVAR was associated with improved early and mid-term outcomes, particularly in certain subsets.

Policymakers have intensified calls to expand work requirements in Medicaid across the United States, which could have implications for low-income adults who experience a high burden of cardiometabolic risk factors and disease. In this difference-in-differences analysis, we found that the implementation of Medicaid work requirements was associated with decreased health insurance coverage, no change in employment status, and a trend towards worse access to care. Our findings suggest that the expansion of work requirements could have major implications for the cardiovascular health of working-age adults in the US.